Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
tutorial:landscape_metrics_in_dinamica_ego [2013/07/29 21:46]
juliana
tutorial:landscape_metrics_in_dinamica_ego [2013/08/14 19:57] (current)
Line 7: Line 7:
   * Mean patch edge length   * Mean patch edge length
   * Fractal dimension   * Fractal dimension
-  * Functors: \\  [[:​log_policy|Log policy]]\\ ​ 
  
-Landscape metrics [[http://​www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/​pubs/​3064|(McGarigal and Marks, 1995)]] can be useful tools to assess the quality of habitats when extensive biodiversity inventories or ecological data are not available or are difficult to obtain, as landscape metrics are strongly related to biodiversity indicators [[http://​www.pantanalecoturismo.tur.br/​fotos/​arquivos/​854.pdf|(Metzger,​ 2006)]]. For example, landscape metrics can be applied to identify the best landscape configuration for forest species conservation -independently of the perceptions of individual species-, which is hypothetically ​ a landscape with: i) a high forest cover; ii) a small number of forest fragments; iii) a high largest forest patch index that can support stable populations and be a source for small patches; iv) a large mean forest patch area; and v) a high mean forest proximity index  (Texeira ​et al., 2009). Therefore, the application of these metrics consists of a powerful tool to describe the consequences of land-use and land-cover dynamics on the conservation of biodiversity. In this context, we introduce here a series of models designed in Dinamica EGO to calculate landscape metrics. Instead of providing a black box solution, all these metrics are developed using Dinamica EGO modeling language, thus they serve as templates to derive a wide variety of metrics.+Landscape metrics [[http://​www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/​pubs/​3064|(McGarigal and Marks, 1995)]] can be useful tools to assess the quality of habitats when extensive biodiversity inventories or ecological data are not available or are difficult to obtain, as landscape metrics are strongly related to biodiversity indicators [[http://​www.pantanalecoturismo.tur.br/​fotos/​arquivos/​854.pdf|(Metzger,​ 2006)]]. For example, landscape metrics can be applied to identify the best landscape configuration for forest species conservation -independently of the perceptions of individual species-, which is hypothetically ​ a landscape with: i) a high forest cover; ii) a small number of forest fragments; iii) a high largest forest patch index that can support stable populations and be a source for small patches; iv) a large mean forest patch area; and v) a high mean forest proximity index  ​[[ http://​dx.doi.org/​10.1016/​j.foreco.2008.10.011|(Teixeira ​et al., 2009)]]. Therefore, the application of these metrics consists of a powerful tool to describe the consequences of land-use and land-cover dynamics on the conservation of biodiversity. In this context, we introduce here a series of models designed in Dinamica EGO to calculate landscape metrics. Instead of providing a black box solution, all these metrics are developed using Dinamica EGO modeling language, thus they serve as templates to derive a wide variety of metrics.
  
-Load the model calc_mean_patch_sizes_and_standard_deviations.ego” from Examples\landscape_metrics\calc_mean_patch_sizes_and_standard_deviations+Load the model ''​calc_mean_patch_sizes_and_standard_deviations.ego'' ​from Examples\landscape_metrics\calc_mean_patch_sizes_and_standard_deviations
  
 {{ :​tutorial:​landscape_1.jpg |}} {{ :​tutorial:​landscape_1.jpg |}}
- 
  
  
Line 24: Line 22:
 </​WRAP>​ </​WRAP>​
  
- +Load now the model ''​calc_mean_patch_edges_and_standard_deviations.ego'' ​from ''​Examples\landscape_metrics\ calc_mean_patch_edges_and_standard_deviations''​.
-Inside this submodel there is a //Log Policy// functor ​ that is used in order to run the model in silent mode, thus increasing its processing speed. ​  +
- +
-{{ :​tutorial:​landscape_2.1.jpg |}} +
- +
- +
- +
-Load now the model calc_mean_patch_edges_and_standard_deviations.ego” from Examples\landscape_metrics\ calc_mean_patch_edges_and_standard_deviations.+
  
 This model calculates the edge length of each patch of a landscape class and for each class the mean patch edge length and patch edge length standard deviation. ​ This model calculates the edge length of each patch of a landscape class and for each class the mean patch edge length and patch edge length standard deviation. ​
- 
-{{ :​tutorial:​landscape_3.jpg |}} 
  
 These two set of metrics are input for more complex metrics, such as fractal dimension and largest patch index. ​ For example, fractal dimension for a landscape class can be estimated using the perimeter-area relationship,​ so If sufficient data are available, the slope of the line obtained by regressing log(P), patch edge lengths, on log(A), patch areas, is equal to 2/D (Burrough, 1986). Check other landscape metrics models, such as mean patch distance, largest patch index, in Examples\landscape_metrics. These two set of metrics are input for more complex metrics, such as fractal dimension and largest patch index. ​ For example, fractal dimension for a landscape class can be estimated using the perimeter-area relationship,​ so If sufficient data are available, the slope of the line obtained by regressing log(P), patch edge lengths, on log(A), patch areas, is equal to 2/D (Burrough, 1986). Check other landscape metrics models, such as mean patch distance, largest patch index, in Examples\landscape_metrics.
  
 [[tutorial:​redd_case_study| Next Lesson]] [[tutorial:​redd_case_study| Next Lesson]]